The Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) advises on matters relating to the safe handling, transport, use, and disposal of biological materials, including recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid molecules, on the Urbana-Champaign campus. The committee reports to the Vice Chancellor of Research and Innovation and is co-chaired by Romana Nowak and Mary Kraft. Questions? email ibc@illinois.edu or call 217.333.2755.
All work with materials requiring registration must be approved by the IBC prior to initiation.
The following materials require registration with the IBC:
The university is responsible for ensuring that all recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid research, irrespective of funding source, is conducted "in full conformity with the provisions of the NIH Guidelines." To ensure compliance with the guidelines, campus policy requires that all recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid work must be registered with the IBC. Work cannot begin on projects involving recombinant or synthetic nucleic acids until the Principal Investigator (PI) receives a notice from the Division of Research Safety and/or the IBC allowing the initiation of work. NIH penalties for university/PI noncompliance may result in: (i) suspension, limitation, or termination of NIH funds for recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid research at the university, or (ii) a requirement for prior NIH approval of any or all recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid projects at the university.
Polio remains endemic in two countries resulting in outbreaks around the world. The U.S. National Authority for Containment of Poliovirus (NAC) at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) launched a surveillance program aimed to minimize the risk of poliovirus release from research and diagnostic laboratories. As part of this program, the Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) added screening questions to the registration process to identify materials which contain or may contain poliovirus according to the criteria established in the WHO Global Action Plan (GAPIV). For more information, visit the DRS Poliovirus Containment Initiative webpage.
In April 2024, the NIH Guidelines added a new section III D-8 to cover experiments that involve gene drive modified organisms generated by recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid molecules. These experiments will be conducted at a minimum of Biosafety Level 2 (BL-2), Animal Biosafety Level 2 (ABL-2), Plant Biosafety Level 2 (PBL-2), or Arthropod Containment Level 2 (ACL-2) containment. For additional guidance from the NIH visit; Biosafety Considerations for Contained Research Involving Gene Drive Modified Organisms.
All materials, facilities and personnel are found at the registration level and must be assigned to an individual project, even if you only have one project. Individual projects under that registration are submitted for review and receive approval dates.
Each PI will be assigned one IBC registration number that will not change. Projects are identified by a period after the registration number. For example, If a PI is given a registration number of IBC-555 then the first project submitted for review will be IBC-555.1. As additional projects are added, they will be numbered in sequential order e.g. IBC-555.1, IBC-555.2, IBC-555.3. If IBC-555.2 is completed, this number will not be reused and the next project will be numbered IBC-555.4.
The IBC meets once per month as per the following schedule. Complete project information must be submitted by 5 p.m. on the submission deadline date before the meeting at which your project will be reviewed.
Submission Deadline | IBC Meeting |
February 14, 2025 | March 11, 2025 |
March 14, 2025 | April 8, 2025 |
April 18, 2025 | May 13, 2025 |
May 16, 2025 | June 10, 2025 |
June 13, 2025 | July 8, 2025 |
July 18, 2025 | August 12, 2025 |
August 15, 2025 | September 9, 2025 |
September 19, 2025 | October 14, 2025 |
Once a project is submitted for review, you will receive an email confirming receipt. In most cases,* the project will be assigned to a panel of faculty reviewers who will review the project to verify your risk assessment for the proposed work. Once submitted for review, the project will be locked. The next step is the question and answer period where the reviewers will ask questions directly in the project. When the review period is complete, the PI and the personnel on the project will be notified via email that their responses to questions are due by a specific date for before the upcoming IBC meeting. Simultaneously, the DRS research safety professional overseeing the project review will determine if any BL-2 or ABL-2 audits are required. All rooms where work will be performed at Biosafety Level 2 or Animal Biosafety Level 2 must be audited before work can begin in that space and will be audited annually thereafter through the laboratory audit program.
Approvals will not be issued until all questions and audit findings have been addressed and all required training completed.
*Some lower risk projects (e.g,. Recombinant DNA projects requiring Biosafety Level 1 containment) may qualify for review by a DRS research safety professional. In these situations, the review process may be expedited. However, the best approach is to plan for the timeline outlined above and in the Submission Deadline/Meeting Schedule section.
An IBC project is valid for 5 years. DRS will send reminders to review and update if no changes have been made for 12 months. Major updates/amendments may require to be re-reviewed by the IBC however the approval date will not change.
NIH requires training when performing experiments with recombinant or synthetic nucleic acids including transgenic plants and animals (including knockouts). This training requirement will be met by completion of the NIH Guidelines Overview module.
Basic training requirements for all laboratories are outlined on the Safety Training Checklist webpage as part of a required Laboratory Safety Plan. This includes the on-line training module, Laboratory Safety.
Additional training and information specific to work at Biosafety level 2 should include:
Review of the following DRS Guidance documents for all equipment being used in the laboratory:
Review of the following DRS Guidance documents for all applicable waste generated in the laboratory:
Laboratory-Specific Training
On May 5, 2025, an Executive Order on Improving the Safety of Biological Research was issued which pauses the 2024 DURC-PEPP policy that was to be implemented on May 6, 2025. The Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) and the National Security Advisor will work with funding agencies to develop a new policy within 120 days to replace the 2024 DURC-PEPP policy. In the interim, previous USC DURC policies and HHH P3CO Framework remain in place. Updates will be made as they are announced.
Dual Use Research of Concern (DURC) is life sciences research that, based on current understanding, can be reasonably anticipated to provide knowledge, information, products, or technologies that could be misapplied to do harm with no, or only minor, modification to pose a significant threat with potential consequences to public health and safety, agricultural crops and other plants, animals, the environment, materiel, or national security.
Pathogen with Enhanced Pandemic Potential (PEPP) is a type of pathogen with pandemic potential (PPP) resulting from experiments that enhance a pathogen’s transmissibility or virulence, or disrupt the effectiveness of pre-existing immunity, regardless of its progenitor agent, such that it may pose a significant threat to public health, the capacity of health systems to function, or national security. Wild-type pathogens that are circulating in or have been recovered from nature are not PEPPs but may be considered PPPs because of their pandemic potential.
On May 6, 2024, the United States Government (USG) released a new policy and implementation guidance for research involving DURC-PEPP. This policy supersedes previous 2012 and 2014 USG DURC policies and the 2017 HHS Framework for Guiding Funding Decisions about Proposed Research Involving Enhanced Potential Pandemic Pathogens (HHS P3CO Framework) beginning May 6, 2025.
The 2012 and 2014 USG DURC policies outlines the criteria for what qualifies as DURC. A list of the 15 agents and toxins and descriptions of the 7 experimental effects for potential DURC research are found here.
To better understand the DURC requirements and when research meets the DURC criteria, the NIH-Office of Sciences Policy provides an overview and case study approach for research that requires oversight of life sciences DURC.
A one time online training entitled DURC Policy Overview is required to be taken by the following campus personnel;
To comply with the US government DURC policy, a campus Institutional Review Entity (IRE) has been established to review research for DURC which is coordinated through the IBC.
It is the responsibility of the Principal Investigator to identify research involving one or more of the agents and toxins on the DURC list and notify the IRE-IBC for review of its DURC potential. The formal review starts with the PI submission of the DURC Review Application which is submitted to ibc@illinois.edu in conjunction with the IBC registration to determine whether or not the project meets the DURC definition. For research that is determined to be DURC, a subcommittee will work with the PI to draft a risk mitigation plan to be submitted to the applicable US government funding agency.
Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories (BMBL 6th Edition)